Law firm website design
$3,500 flat, 21 days, WordPress you own. The build at the center of this comparison.
Most of these comparison pages exist because the other company does something we think is a trap. This one's different. The Modern Firm is a long-running, independent shop that builds on WordPress, hands you a site you actually own, and openly warns lawyers off proprietary lock-in, long contracts, and forced marketing bundles. We agree with all of it. So this isn't a takedown. It's an honest read on three narrow differences that might matter to you, and a straight answer about where they're the better choice. If you're choosing between us, you're already choosing well.
It's worth being clear about how much common ground there is before anyone draws a line. On the things that burn most lawyers, we and The Modern Firm are on the same side. The differences sit on top of that shared foundation, not against it.
The Modern Firm doesn't publish a fixed price list, and its process is consultative by design, so specifics below come from its own published guidance and general practice rather than a posted sheet. None of the four differences makes either of us right. They're just choices, and one set will fit your firm better than the other.
Both are solid choices for a solo or small firm that wants to own its website. This is about temperament and priorities as much as features.
The first rows are the agreement, stated plainly so it doesn't get lost. The later rows are the real differences. The Modern Firm's column reflects its published approach, not a posted price sheet.
| Feature | FirmForte | The Modern Firm |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | WordPress | WordPress (same) |
| Who owns the site | You | You (same) |
| Lock-in | None | None (same) |
| Pricing | Four flat tiers posted on the site, from $3,500 | Quoted per firm after a call; no posted price list |
| Process | Productized: fixed scope, one design revision round | Bespoke and consultative, scoped to each firm |
| Timeline | 21 days, fixed, same every build | Varies by scope; collaborative rather than fixed |
| AEO (cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews) | Default spine: FAQ + LegalService schema, answer-first content on every page | Strong on SEO and content; AEO isn't a named, built-in service |
| Hosting & maintenance | You host on a vendor you choose; updates are yours or on a retainer | Managed for you: monthly hosting and upkeep handled hands-off |
| Best fit | Firms wanting AEO, a posted price, and a fast fixed launch | Firms wanting a bespoke process and hands-off, managed care |
Strip away the things we agree on and one difference is left standing. The Modern Firm builds a genuinely good website and does real SEO. We do that too, but the whole shop is organized around being found and cited by AI engines, not just ranked in Google. That's a different center of gravity, and it's the honest reason to pick one of us over the other.
Every FirmForte page ships with conversational Q&A blocks and FAQ plus LegalService schema, written so ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google's AI Overviews can pull a clean answer about who you are, where you practice, and what you charge. It's not an upsell or a phase two. It's how the site is built on day one.
On the retainer tiers we monitor whether the four major AI engines actually name your firm for the queries that matter, and adjust when they don't. Most web shops, including very good ones, aren't yet measuring this, because Google rankings are still the default scoreboard.
Here's the part most "AEO" pitches skip. The schema is hygiene and rich-result eligibility, not a magic switch that forces a citation. The content earns the mention. We say so on the AEO page too, because overpromising on this is exactly how the industry lost lawyers' trust in the first place.
Then this difference doesn't move you, and you should weigh the rest on its merits. A firm that mainly wants a beautiful, well-written, owned WordPress site and isn't fussed about AI citations yet will be happy with either of us. We'd rather say that than pretend the gap is bigger than it is.
This is the section a sales page usually skips. We're not skipping it, because there are real firms we'd send their way without hesitation.
Our build is productized on purpose: fixed scope, one revision round, 21 days. That's a feature for some firms and a constraint for others. If you want an open, exploratory design process with more back-and-forth and more options on the table, The Modern Firm's consultative model is built for exactly that, and ours isn't.
The Modern Firm hosts and maintains your site on a monthly plan, testing and applying WordPress updates so you never think about them. We hand you the keys instead, which means more independence but more responsibility. If "I never want to touch the technical side again" describes you, their managed model is the more comfortable fit.
They've been doing this for small firms for a long time, through several eras of the web, and that depth of experience is real. We're newer and leaner, and we built the AEO-first model for where search is going. Both are legitimate things to weigh. Some firms want the seasoned hand; some want the bet on what's next.
Our process suits a firm that wants the decision made, the price known, and the site live next month. If you'd rather treat the website as a slower, considered project with a partner who'll sit in the weeds with you, that's a different working style, and it's one they're set up to deliver.
The full FirmForte lineup (Audit + Fix, Launch, Launch + Grow, Multi-Attorney) is on the pricing page, and the build is detailed on web design. Comparing the bigger players instead? See FirmForte vs Scorpion and FirmForte vs FindLaw.
If your question isn't here, drop it in the audit form below. We answer everything within a business day.
The comparison above is the why. These are the what.
$3,500 flat, 21 days, WordPress you own. The build at the center of this comparison.
The difference that actually separates us here. Built into every site at launch.
Posted numbers, same for everyone, no discovery call required to see them.
How FirmForte stacks up against the other names solo and small firms end up shortlisting.
The honest trade-offs between building it yourself, hiring a freelancer, and a productized agency build.
A site you own outright versus the directory-and-template model FindLaw is known for.
Custom, AEO-first builds against Justia's bundled directory-and-website package.
Published pricing and full code ownership set against a proprietary platform with quote-on-request contracts.
Send us the URL. Within 48 hours, we'll come back with a 6-page report covering what's converting, what's leaking, and where your firm shows up (or doesn't) in AI search.
Read by a human. 48-hour turnaround. No card required.